Analyzing Hedge Fund and CTA Fee Structures

  • Managed Futures Advanced
Investors know that the traditional fees charged by a hedge fund or commodity trading advisor are 2/20 - a two percent annual management fee for assets under management, and a twenty percent incentive fees on net new profits generated by the fund.  While the standard has long been the 2/20 structure, investors can many times negotiate slightly different fee structures depending on the size of their investment. 

Outside of the normal 2/20 fee structure, hedge funds and commodity trading advisors may agree to take clients at 1/25, and even 0/30.  Is 1/25 better than 2/20?And is 0/30 better than both? Not necessarily.  Deciding which fee structure to choose when investing with a fund largely depends on your performance expectation for that fund.  The following table will help investors make the best decision on which fee structure to choose:


varying hedge fund fee structures 

If your performance expectation from an investment is to gross less than 15% annually, then you're better off taking the 0/30 fee structure.  Gross returns up to 15% yield the best net return (10.15%) with a 0/30 fee structure.  If expectations are that gross returns will be between 15% to 17% annually, then taking a 1/25 structure yields the highest net return.  If expectations are that a fund's performance will exceed 17%, then the 2/20 fee structure is preferred.  Any return greater than 17%, and 2/20 will yield you the highest net return.  The higher the return past 17%, the greater the difference becomes between 2/20 and the other two fee structures.

Forecasting a fund's performance could seem like a daunting task - how do you "predict" what an investment will yield? The best way to make a projection is to look at the average annual historical return, and compare that with the annual standard deviation.  This should provide an expected range of returns for the investment, and help determine where it falls on the table. 

For a conservative return expectation (single digit returns), the 0/30 fee structure should be a no brainer;  0/30  yields the highest net return, and if the fund underperforms - either low single digit returns or negative returns - then the savings with 0/30 can be substantial when compared with the 1/25 or 2/20. Conversely, for aggressive investments, the 2/20 fee structure offers the most savings as gross returns exceed 30%. 

Disclaimer: Past performance is not indicative of future results. Futures trading involves substantial risk of loss and may not be suitable for everyone. By no means is this newsletter/blog post offering any investment advice or suggesting to make any trade recommendations. Please consult an aiSource advisor prior to opening any managed futures accounts.


Sign up to access hundreds of different managed futures programs in our CTA database.


Get the latest reports in managed futures, straight from the Source. Enter your email and get the news.


A simple way to monitor your CTA portfolio without the hassle of looking at FCM statements.

Past performance is not necessarily indicative of future results. Trading commodity futures, options, and foreign exchange ("forex") involves substantial risk of loss and is not suitable for all investors. In no way is the advisor of the month a direct recommendation of aiSource or any of its affiliates. Please carefully review the disclosure documents and any other promotional material prior to investing with any program. Managed accounts and/or managed futures are very risky and may not be suitable for all investors. Please consult with a Managed Futures specialists prior to investing.